<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Fujifilm S5700 vs Film Minolta SRT101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hatphoto.nomagicpill.org/2008/10/digital-fujifilm-s5700-vs-film-minolta-srt101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hatphoto.nomagicpill.org/2008/10/digital-fujifilm-s5700-vs-film-minolta-srt101/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:44:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Laddie</title>
		<link>http://hatphoto.nomagicpill.org/2008/10/digital-fujifilm-s5700-vs-film-minolta-srt101/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>The Laddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 08:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatphoto.nomagicpill.org/?p=8#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I have to admit though your game did step up since the film.

I found the colors and just the feel of the images seemed a little more saturated and warm. Its something that can be archived with the S5700 but not something you have shown pre film.

Costs wise I agree its too expensive. But I think that ignoring the technical side of it all the Minolta makes pleasing pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit though your game did step up since the film.</p>
<p>I found the colors and just the feel of the images seemed a little more saturated and warm. Its something that can be archived with the S5700 but not something you have shown pre film.</p>
<p>Costs wise I agree its too expensive. But I think that ignoring the technical side of it all the Minolta makes pleasing pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

